Cerence vs Grid Dynamics
CRNC and GDYN side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CRNC and GDYN compare
Grid Dynamics is the larger company, worth 3.0 times as much as Cerence ($1.1B against $358M).
Cerence grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (25.8% versus 6.6% for Grid Dynamics).
Grid Dynamics keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.8% compared with −5.0% at Cerence.
Grid Dynamics scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 9 for Cerence), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CRNC | GDYN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $358M | $1.1B |
| Share price | $7.92 | $13.21 |
| Change, 1 year | −13.1% | 56.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −92.4% | −65.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.00 | 1.49 |
| Employees | 1,300 | 4,961 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 147× |
| P/S | 1.2× (better) | 2.5× |
| P/B | 2.2× | 2.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.4× (better) | 26.4× |
| P/FCF | 4.6× (better) | 40.4× |
| FCF yield | 22.0% (better) | 2.5% |
| Fair value | $8.15 | $15.20 |
| Margin of safety | 2.9% | 13.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 25.8% (better) | 6.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −5.3% | 29.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −43.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −40.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 78.7% (better) | 36.5% |
| Operating margin | 8.7% (better) | 1.7% |
| Net margin | −5.0% | 1.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 25.4% (better) | 6.1% |
| Return on equity | −9.6% | 1.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 3.9% (better) | 1.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.04 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.71 | – |
| Interest coverage | 4.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.08 | 7.34 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −0.80 | 9.60 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | −0.28% | 3.5% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | −0.28% | 3.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 82.9% | 77.4% |
| Held by insiders | 8.3% | 6.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.4M (better) | −$3.8M |
| Short interest, % of float | 12.2% | 5.3% |
Go deeper
- CRNC stock overview
- CRNC income statement
- CRNC valuation and score
- GDYN stock overview
- GDYN income statement
- GDYN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.