Comstock Resources vs Matador Resources
CRK and MTDR side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CRK and MTDR compare
Matador Resources is the larger company, worth 1.5 times as much as Comstock Resources ($6.4B against $4.4B).
On earnings, Matador Resources is cheaper: it trades at 9.0× trailing earnings, against 10.4× for Comstock Resources.
Comstock Resources grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.6% versus 1.3% for Matador Resources).
Comstock Resources keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 19.8% compared with 18.6% at Matador Resources.
Matador Resources pays a dividend yielding 2.2%; Comstock Resources does not pay one.
Matador Resources scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 6 for Comstock Resources), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CRK | MTDR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.4B | $6.4B |
| Share price | $15.13 | $52.08 |
| Change, 1 year | −36.0% | 31.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 78.6% | 27.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.97 | 0.89 |
| Employees | 252 | 483 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 10.4× | 9.0× (better) |
| P/S | 2.1× | 1.7× (better) |
| P/B | 1.7× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.7× | 3.0× (better) |
| FCF yield | −18.4% | – |
| Fair value | $11.71 | $72.17 |
| Margin of safety | −29.2% | 27.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 17.6% (better) | 1.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 20.9% | 33.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 641% (better) | −7.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 484% (better) | −7.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 28.4% | 31.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 19.8% (better) | 18.6% |
| FCF margin | −38.7% | – |
| Return on equity | 16.9% (better) | 12.5% |
| Return on invested capital | 8.7% | 16.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.29 | 0.11 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.67 | 0.26 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 2.7× | 4.9× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.60 (better) | 0.55 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.28 (better) | 1.26 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.2% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 25.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.46% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 25.1% | 97.1% |
| Held by insiders | 2.3% | 1.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.0M | $2.6M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.2% | 12.6% |
Go deeper
- CRK stock overview
- CRK income statement
- CRK valuation and score
- MTDR stock overview
- MTDR income statement
- MTDR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.