Crescent Energy vs Viper Energy
CRGY and VNOM side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CRGY and VNOM compare
Viper Energy is the larger company, worth 3.7 times as much as Crescent Energy ($17.1B against $4.7B).
Viper Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (108% versus 24.3% for Crescent Energy).
Viper Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.9% compared with 1.3% at Crescent Energy.
Both pay dividends: Crescent Energy yields 3.4% and Viper Energy 5.1%.
Viper Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 7 for Crescent Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CRGY | VNOM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.7B | $17.1B |
| Share price | $14.20 | $47.68 |
| Change, 1 year | 74.4% | 28.4% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 107% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.85 | 0.50 |
| Employees | 1,066 | 711 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 1.1× (better) | 8.4× |
| P/B | – | 3.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.4× (better) | 95.5× |
| Fair value | $30.25 | $25.72 |
| Margin of safety | 53.1% (better) | −85.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 24.3% | 108% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 36.5% | 41.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 137% (better) | −84.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 20.6% (better) | 12.3% |
| Net margin | 1.3% | 2.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 1.4% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 3.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.33 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.24 (better) | 6.38 |
| Interest coverage | 2.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.94 | 6.37 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.01 | 6.05 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.4% | 5.1% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 256% | 680% |
| Buyback yield | −0.01% | 0.00% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 3.4% | 5.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 91.3% | 55.2% |
| Held by insiders | 34.8% | 40.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$402M (better) | −$589M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 17.1% | 5.5% |
Go deeper
- CRGY stock overview
- CRGY income statement
- CRGY valuation and score
- VNOM stock overview
- VNOM income statement
- VNOM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.