Crescent Energy vs Matador Resources
CRGY and MTDR side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CRGY and MTDR compare
Matador Resources is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as Crescent Energy ($6.4B against $3.8B).
Crescent Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (33.5% versus 1.3% for Matador Resources).
Matador Resources keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 18.6% compared with 1.3% at Crescent Energy.
Both pay dividends: Crescent Energy yields 4.1% and Matador Resources 2.2%.
Matador Resources scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 8 for Crescent Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CRGY | MTDR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.8B | $6.4B |
| Share price | $11.61 | $52.08 |
| Change, 1 year | 29.6% | 31.6% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 27.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.89 | 0.89 |
| Employees | 1,066 | 483 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 9.0× |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 1.7× |
| P/B | – | 1.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.2× | 3.0× (better) |
| Fair value | $32.89 | $72.17 |
| Margin of safety | 64.7% (better) | 27.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 33.5% (better) | 1.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 36.5% (better) | 33.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 164% (better) | −7.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −7.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 27.8% | 31.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.3% | 18.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 12.5% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 16.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.11 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.74 | 0.26 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 3.5× | 4.9× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.67 (better) | 0.55 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.08 | 1.26 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.1% (better) | 2.2% |
| Payout ratio | 240% | 25.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 4 |
| Buyback yield | −0.01% | 0.46% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 4.1% (better) | 2.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 91.3% | 97.1% |
| Held by insiders | 34.8% | 1.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$402M | $2.6M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 16.9% | 12.6% |
Go deeper
- CRGY stock overview
- CRGY income statement
- CRGY valuation and score
- MTDR stock overview
- MTDR income statement
- MTDR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.