Cre8 Enterprise vs 36Kr
CRE and KRKR side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CRE and KRKR compare
Cre8 Enterprise grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (26.1% versus −1.4% for 36Kr).
Cre8 Enterprise scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 7 for 36Kr), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CRE | KRKR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $2.64 | $2.72 |
| Change, 1 year | −54.5% | −52.5% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −91.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.55 | 0.87 |
| Employees | 91 | 98 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 26.1% (better) | −1.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | −10.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −17.6% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −19.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 41.9% | 57.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | 4.5% (better) | 4.4% |
| Net margin | 4.0% | – |
| FCF margin | 8.3% | 8.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 17.2% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 92.1% (better) | 39.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.16 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −7.95 | – |
| Interest coverage | 23.4× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.57 (better) | 1.21 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 0.00% |
| Held by insiders | 26.6% | 8.6% |
Go deeper
- CRE stock overview
- CRE income statement
- CRE valuation and score
- KRKR stock overview
- KRKR income statement
- KRKR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.