Credo Technology vs Penguin Solutions
CRDO and PENG side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CRDO and PENG compare
Credo Technology is the larger company, worth 11 times as much as Penguin Solutions ($28.4B against $2.7B).
On earnings, Penguin Solutions is cheaper: it trades at 36.8× trailing earnings, against 53.7× for Credo Technology.
Credo Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (165% versus 12.0% for Penguin Solutions).
Credo Technology keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 33.8% compared with 6.4% at Penguin Solutions.
Credo Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 8 for Penguin Solutions), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CRDO | PENG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $28.4B | $2.7B |
| Share price | $150.99 | $51.93 |
| Change, 1 year | −12.0% | 132% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 79.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.51 | 2.07 |
| Employees | – | 2,800 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 53.7× | 36.8× (better) |
| P/S | 17.8× | 1.8× (better) |
| P/B | 10.4× | 6.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 50.9× | 16.8× (better) |
| P/FCF | 64.7× | – |
| FCF yield | 1.5% (better) | −2.6% |
| Fair value | $85.11 | $52.28 |
| Margin of safety | −77.4% | 0.66% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 165% (better) | 12.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 86.8% (better) | 4.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 330% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 319% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 67.1% (better) | 27.9% |
| Operating margin | 31.7% (better) | 7.2% |
| Net margin | 33.8% (better) | 6.4% |
| FCF margin | 27.6% (better) | −4.6% |
| Return on equity | 30.7% (better) | 18.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 44.5% (better) | 18.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 1.01 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.02 |
| Current ratio | 7.40 (better) | 1.54 |
| Altman Z-score | 61.73 (better) | 2.30 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 2.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 70.4% | 112% |
| Held by insiders | 11.0% | 16.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$363M | −$4.4M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.7% | 15.7% |
Go deeper
- CRDO stock overview
- CRDO income statement
- CRDO valuation and score
- PENG stock overview
- PENG income statement
- PENG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.