Credo Technology vs Diodes
CRDO and DIOD side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CRDO and DIOD compare
Credo Technology is the larger company, worth 7.7 times as much as Diodes ($28.4B against $3.7B).
On earnings, Diodes is cheaper: it trades at 43.3× trailing earnings, against 53.7× for Credo Technology.
Credo Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (165% versus 17.8% for Diodes).
Credo Technology keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 33.8% compared with 5.3% at Diodes.
Credo Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 10 for Diodes), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CRDO | DIOD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $28.4B | $3.7B |
| Share price | $150.99 | $80.13 |
| Change, 1 year | −12.0% | 47.1% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −25.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.51 | 1.58 |
| Employees | – | 7,989 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 53.7× | 43.3× (better) |
| P/S | 17.8× | 2.3× (better) |
| P/B | 10.4× | 1.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 50.9× | 42.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | 64.7× | 25.9× (better) |
| FCF yield | 1.5% | 3.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $85.11 | $51.28 |
| Margin of safety | −77.4% | −56.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 165% (better) | 17.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 86.8% (better) | 3.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 330% (better) | 35.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 319% (better) | 35.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −5.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 67.1% (better) | 31.7% |
| Operating margin | 31.7% (better) | 4.8% |
| Net margin | 33.8% (better) | 5.3% |
| FCF margin | 27.6% (better) | 8.7% |
| Return on equity | 30.7% (better) | 4.5% |
| Return on invested capital | 44.5% (better) | 4.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −5.63 |
| Interest coverage | – | 27.6× |
| Current ratio | 7.40 (better) | 3.17 |
| Altman Z-score | 61.73 (better) | 5.11 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 70.4% | 99.5% |
| Held by insiders | 11.0% | 1.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$363M | −$16.8M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.7% | 5.6% |
Go deeper
- CRDO stock overview
- CRDO income statement
- CRDO valuation and score
- DIOD stock overview
- DIOD income statement
- DIOD valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.