CPS Technologies vs Espey Mfg & Electronics
CPSH and ESP side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CPSH and ESP compare
Espey Mfg & Electronics is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as CPS Technologies ($145M against $79.5M).
CPS Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.0% versus 4.9% for Espey Mfg & Electronics).
Espey Mfg & Electronics keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 24.2% compared with 0.32% at CPS Technologies.
Espey Mfg & Electronics pays a dividend yielding 3.7%; CPS Technologies does not pay one.
Espey Mfg & Electronics scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 8 for CPS Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CPSH | ESP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $79.5M | $145M |
| Share price | $4.10 | $47.90 |
| Change, 1 year | 20.6% | 26.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −6.2% | 218% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.82 | 0.69 |
| Employees | 117 | 144 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 20 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 12.3× |
| P/S | 2.4× (better) | 3.2× |
| P/B | 2.3× (better) | 2.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 793× | 8.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 56.3× |
| PEG | – | 0.33 |
| FCF yield | −5.0% | 1.8% (better) |
| Fair value | $1.75 | $74.43 |
| Margin of safety | −134% | 35.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.0% (better) | 4.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.3% | 10.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 37.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 28.8% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −15.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 15.1% | 35.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | −1.6% | 25.1% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.32% | 24.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | −12.2% | 5.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | 0.42% | 20.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −3.9% | 86.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 6.44 (better) | 2.50 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.01 | 4.48 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 3.7% |
| Payout ratio | – | 43.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 3 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 28.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 3.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 30.7% | 35.9% |
| Held by insiders | 17.0% | 3.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $8.9K (better) | −$1.9M |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.1% | 1.1% |
Go deeper
- CPSH stock overview
- CPSH income statement
- CPSH valuation and score
- ESP stock overview
- ESP income statement
- ESP valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.