Cooper-Standard vs Phinia
CPS and PHIN side by side, both in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CPS and PHIN compare
Phinia is the larger company, worth 6.5 times as much as Cooper-Standard ($2.3B against $357M).
Cooper-Standard grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.9% versus 5.6% for Phinia).
Phinia keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.2% compared with −1.7% at Cooper-Standard.
Phinia pays a dividend yielding 1.9%; Cooper-Standard does not pay one.
Phinia scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 5 for Cooper-Standard), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CPS | PHIN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $357M | $2.3B |
| Share price | $20.07 | $62.92 |
| Change, 1 year | −48.0% | 21.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −7.9% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.33 | 0.98 |
| Employees | 22K | 13K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 12.7× |
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 0.6× |
| P/B | – | 1.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.5× | 6.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 10.2× |
| FCF yield | −7.9% | 9.8% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $78.49 |
| Margin of safety | – | 19.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 27.9% (better) | 5.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 110% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 123% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 12.0% | 22.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 2.9% | 8.3% (better) |
| Net margin | −1.7% | 5.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | −0.81% | 6.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 12.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 9.3% | 10.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.72 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 10.06 | 1.41 (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.36 | 1.70 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.90 | 2.07 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.9% |
| Payout ratio | – | 22.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 2 |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 64.9% | 103% |
| Held by insiders | 5.5% | 2.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $295K (better) | −$4.5M |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.1% | 10.6% |
Go deeper
- CPS stock overview
- CPS income statement
- CPS valuation and score
- PHIN stock overview
- PHIN income statement
- PHIN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.