Copart vs Rush Enterprises
CPRT and RUSHA side by side, both in retail-auto dealers & gasoline stations. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CPRT and RUSHA compare
Copart grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (0.41% versus −5.9% for Rush Enterprises).
Copart keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 31.8% compared with 3.7% at Rush Enterprises.
Copart scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 9 for Rush Enterprises), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CPRT | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $27.9B | – |
| Share price | $30.13 | $42.98 |
| Change, 1 year | −29.1% | 28.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −21.7% | 76.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.94 | 0.80 |
| Employees | 7,600 | 7,355 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 19.4× | – |
| P/S | 6.0× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.8× | – |
| P/FCF | 22.0× | – |
| PEG | 2.95 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.5% | – |
| Fair value | $31.37 | – |
| Margin of safety | 4.0% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.41% (better) | −5.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.6% (better) | 9.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −4.4% (better) | −7.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −2.5% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 9.8% | 19.2% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 19.7% |
| Operating margin | 35.4% (better) | 5.1% |
| Net margin | 31.8% (better) | 3.7% |
| FCF margin | 27.2% (better) | 4.8% |
| Return on equity | – | 11.8% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 12.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.12 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.03 |
| Interest coverage | – | 10.2× |
| Current ratio | 7.91 (better) | 1.45 |
| Altman Z-score | 21.03 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | – | 22.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 4 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 22.0% |
| Buyback yield | 5.8% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 5.8% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 85.1% | 138% |
| Held by insiders | 9.0% | 13.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$8.8M (better) | −$12.0M |
| Superinvestors holding | 4 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.4% | – |
Go deeper
- CPRT stock overview
- CPRT income statement
- CPRT valuation and score
- RUSHA stock overview
- RUSHA income statement
- RUSHA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.