Copart vs Camping World
CPRT and CWH side by side, both in retail-auto dealers & gasoline stations. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CPRT and CWH compare
Copart is the larger company, worth 54 times as much as Camping World ($27.9B against $516M).
Copart grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (0.41% versus −0.80% for Camping World).
Copart keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 31.8% compared with −1.6% at Camping World.
Camping World pays a dividend yielding 2.5%; Copart does not pay one.
Copart scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 5 for Camping World), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CPRT | CWH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $27.9B | $516M |
| Share price | $30.13 | $5.00 |
| Change, 1 year | −29.1% | −60.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −21.7% | −87.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.94 | 1.64 |
| Employees | 7,600 | 362 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 19.4× | – |
| P/S | 6.0× | 0.1× (better) |
| P/B | – | 2.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.8× | 7.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | 22.0× | – |
| PEG | 2.95 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.5% | – |
| Fair value | $31.37 | $7.80 |
| Margin of safety | 4.0% | 35.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.41% (better) | −0.80% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.6% (better) | 3.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −4.4% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −2.5% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 9.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 28.7% |
| Operating margin | 35.4% (better) | 2.3% |
| Net margin | 31.8% (better) | −1.6% |
| FCF margin | 27.2% | – |
| Return on equity | – | −33.2% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 4.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 5.72 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 4.93 |
| Current ratio | 7.91 (better) | 1.22 |
| Altman Z-score | 21.03 (better) | 1.57 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.5% |
| Buyback yield | 5.8% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 5.8% (better) | 2.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 85.1% | 62.2% |
| Held by insiders | 9.0% | 42.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$8.8M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 4 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.4% | 19.4% |
Go deeper
- CPRT stock overview
- CPRT income statement
- CPRT valuation and score
- CWH stock overview
- CWH income statement
- CWH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.