Capri vs Wolverine World Wide
CPRI and WWW side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CPRI and WWW compare
Capri and Wolverine World Wide are about the same size, with market caps of $2.2B and $2.0B.
On earnings, Capri is cheaper: it trades at 12.1× trailing earnings, against 14.1× for Wolverine World Wide.
Wolverine World Wide grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.3% versus −4.2% for Capri).
Wolverine World Wide keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.5% compared with 6.1% at Capri.
Wolverine World Wide pays a dividend yielding 1.6%; Capri does not pay one.
Wolverine World Wide scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 8 for Capri), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CPRI | WWW |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.2B | $2.0B |
| Share price | $21.46 | $24.89 |
| Change, 1 year | −2.8% | 55.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −65.7% | −25.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.37 | 1.33 |
| Employees | 11K | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.1× (better) | 14.1× |
| P/S | 0.7× (better) | 1.0× |
| P/B | 34.1× | 4.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.5× | 10.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | 12.1× | 9.7× (better) |
| FCF yield | 8.3% | 10.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $19.96 | $26.33 |
| Margin of safety | −7.5% | 5.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −4.2% | 7.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −3.1% | 0.91% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 71.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 67.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 63.3% (better) | 49.0% |
| Operating margin | 1.4% | 11.1% (better) |
| Net margin | 6.1% | 7.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.4% | 10.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 33.5% |
| Return on invested capital | 4.4% | 20.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 7.38 | 1.07 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.14 | 1.66 (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.18 | 1.85 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.51 | 3.77 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.6% |
| Payout ratio | – | 22.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 0.00% |
| Buyback yield | 12.8% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 12.8% (better) | 1.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 109% | 103% |
| Held by insiders | 2.8% | 1.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.3M | −$1.0M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.7% | 6.4% |
Go deeper
- CPRI stock overview
- CPRI income statement
- CPRI valuation and score
- WWW stock overview
- WWW income statement
- WWW valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.