Capri vs Tapestry
CPRI and TPR side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CPRI and TPR compare
Tapestry is the larger company, worth 11 times as much as Capri ($23.2B against $2.1B).
On earnings, Capri is cheaper: it trades at 10.5× trailing earnings, against 16.0× for Tapestry.
Tapestry grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.2% versus −4.2% for Capri).
Tapestry keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 19.1% compared with 6.1% at Capri.
Tapestry pays a dividend yielding 1.4%; Capri does not pay one.
Tapestry scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 9 for Capri), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CPRI | TPR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.1B | $23.2B |
| Share price | $18.68 | $116.29 |
| Change, 1 year | −12.5% | 3.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −71.4% | 174% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.43 | 1.13 |
| Employees | 11K | 21K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 10.5× (better) | 16.0× |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 2.9× |
| P/B | 32.7× (better) | 33.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.0× | 11.8× (better) |
| P/FCF | 11.5× (better) | 12.8× |
| PEG | – | 0.69 |
| FCF yield | 8.7% (better) | 7.8% |
| Fair value | $19.57 | $95.67 |
| Margin of safety | 4.5% (better) | −21.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −4.2% | 14.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −3.1% | 6.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 734% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 787% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 19.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 63.3% | 77.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | 1.4% | 23.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 6.1% | 19.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.4% | 22.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 197% |
| Return on invested capital | 4.4% | 76.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 7.38 | 3.46 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.14 | 0.60 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 16.0× |
| Current ratio | 1.18 | 1.75 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.49 | 4.01 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.4% |
| Payout ratio | – | 21.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 1 |
| Buyback yield | 13.3% (better) | 6.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 13.3% (better) | 8.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 99.6% | 99.7% |
| Held by insiders | 2.6% | 0.66% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.3M (better) | −$48.4M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 12.8% | 7.9% |
Go deeper
- CPRI stock overview
- CPRI income statement
- CPRI valuation and score
- TPR stock overview
- TPR income statement
- TPR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.