StockData

Coupang vs Vipshop

CPNG and VIPS side by side, both in nonstore retailers. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CPNG and VIPS compare

Coupang grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.4% versus −2.3% for Vipshop).

Vipshop keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.8% compared with −3.8% at Coupang.

Vipshop scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 3 for Coupang), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCPNGVIPS
Size and price
Market cap$27.5B–
Share price$15.29$12.94
Change, 1 year−46.6%−34.8%
Change, 5 years−43.7%28.9%
Beta (5Y)1.100.69
Employees108K15K
StockData Score
Total score38 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score03 (better)
Health score14 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.8×–
FCF yield−1.5%–
Fair value$13.43–
Margin of safety−13.8%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)7.4% (better)−2.3%
Revenue growth, 5Y average23.6% (better)0.78%
Net income growth (TTM)−449%−6.4% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)−462%−1.4% (better)
EPS growth, 5Y average–10.6%
Profitability
Gross margin27.4% (better)23.1%
Operating margin−3.4%7.7% (better)
Net margin−3.8%6.8% (better)
FCF margin−1.1%5.2% (better)
Return on equity–17.9%
Return on invested capital–40.3%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.14
Net debt / EBITDA–−2.82
Interest coverage−16.3×90.4× (better)
Current ratio0.801.28 (better)
Altman Z-score2.26–
Piotroski F-score66
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio–24.8%
Buyback yield4.4%–
Shareholder yield4.4%–
Ownership
Held by institutions75.3%–
Held by insiders46.8%45.1%
Insider net buying, 12 months$133M (better)−$951K
Superinvestors holding8 (better)1
Short interest, % of float8.3%–

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.