StockData

China Pharma vs Kyntra Bio

CPHI and KYNB side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CPHI and KYNB compare

China Pharma is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as Kyntra Bio ($23.4M against $14.9M).

China Pharma grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−11.0% versus −37.1% for Kyntra Bio).

Kyntra Bio keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3968% compared with −114% at China Pharma.

Kyntra Bio scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 4 for China Pharma), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCPHIKYNB
Size and price
Market cap$23.4M$14.9M
Share price$0.543$3.68
Change, 1 year−64.5%−66.5%
Change, 5 years−99.8%−98.8%
Beta (5Y)0.891.26
Employees22134
StockData Score
Total score45 (better)
Valuation score12 (better)
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score12 (better)
Health score11
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E–0.1×
P/S6.0×3.2× (better)
P/B0.6×–
FCF yield–−255%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−11.0% (better)−37.1%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−17.5% (better)−48.4%
Profitability
Gross margin11.8% (better)6.3%
Operating margin−112% (better)−1090%
Net margin−114%3968% (better)
FCF margin–−824%
Return on equity−21.0%–
Return on invested capital−15.5%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.05–
Interest coverage−136.5×−5.4× (better)
Current ratio0.262.69 (better)
Altman Z-score−0.30 (better)−24.47
Piotroski F-score6 (better)5
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions0.47%24.7%
Held by insiders0.00%15.7%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$39.7K
Short interest, % of float0.21%2.8%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.