Campbell'S vs Hain Celestial
CPB and HAIN side by side, both in food and kindred products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CPB and HAIN compare
Campbell'S is the larger company, worth 533 times as much as Hain Celestial ($6.8B against $12.7M).
Campbell'S grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−5.0% versus −18.7% for Hain Celestial).
Campbell'S keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.1% compared with −23.7% at Hain Celestial.
Campbell'S pays a dividend yielding 6.2%; Hain Celestial does not pay one.
Campbell'S scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 4 for Hain Celestial), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CPB | HAIN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.8B | $12.7M |
| Share price | $22.77 | $0.140 |
| Change, 1 year | −27.0% | −90.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −43.9% | −99.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.09 | 0.99 |
| Employees | 14K | 1,800 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.4× | – |
| P/S | 0.7× | 0.0× (better) |
| P/B | 1.8× | 0.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.7× | – |
| P/FCF | 10.0× | – |
| FCF yield | 10.0% | – |
| Fair value | $28.43 | $7.49 |
| Margin of safety | 19.9% | 98.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −5.0% (better) | −18.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.8% (better) | −7.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −33.1% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −34.8% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −16.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 28.1% (better) | 20.9% |
| Operating margin | 8.7% (better) | −17.0% |
| Net margin | 4.1% (better) | −23.7% |
| FCF margin | 7.0% | – |
| Return on equity | 10.4% (better) | −100% |
| Return on invested capital | 6.1% (better) | −18.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.85 (better) | 4.08 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.33 | – |
| Interest coverage | 2.6× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.82 (better) | 0.52 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.52 (better) | −0.29 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 6.2% | – |
| Payout ratio | 117% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 1.3% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.38% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 6.6% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 62.1% | 80.4% |
| Held by insiders | 38.5% | 2.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$390K | −$63.1K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 21.1% | 7.0% |
Go deeper
- CPB stock overview
- CPB income statement
- CPB valuation and score
- HAIN stock overview
- HAIN income statement
- HAIN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.