Cementos Pacasmayo SAA vs Titan America
CPAC and TTAM side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CPAC and TTAM compare
Cementos Pacasmayo SAA grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.0% versus 1.8% for Titan America).
Titan America scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 3 for Cementos Pacasmayo SAA), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CPAC | TTAM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $12.90 | $11.25 |
| Change, 1 year | 78.4% | −28.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 88.9% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.27 | 0.92 |
| Employees | 1,975 | 2,554 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.0% (better) | 1.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 6.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 38.1% (better) | 26.1% |
| Operating margin | 16.4% (better) | 16.1% |
| FCF margin | 12.2% (better) | 8.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.49 |
| Interest coverage | 3.7× | 11.9× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.09 | 3.03 (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.29% | – |
| Held by insiders | 100% | 0.02% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $299K |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 1.7% |
Go deeper
- CPAC stock overview
- CPAC income statement
- CPAC valuation and score
- TTAM stock overview
- TTAM income statement
- TTAM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.