Coty vs Kenvue
COTY and KVUE side by side, both in soap, detergents, and cleaning preparations; perfumes, cosmetics, and other toilet preparations. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How COTY and KVUE compare
Kenvue is the larger company, worth 12 times as much as Coty ($37.1B against $3.0B).
Kenvue grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.5% versus −1.5% for Coty).
Kenvue keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.9% compared with −10.4% at Coty.
Kenvue pays a dividend yielding 5.4%; Coty does not pay one.
Kenvue scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 4 for Coty), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | COTY | KVUE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.0B | $37.1B |
| Share price | $3.40 | $19.31 |
| Change, 1 year | −13.9% | 34.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −63.4% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.05 | 0.17 |
| Employees | 11K | 22K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 21.9× |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 2.4× |
| P/B | 1.0× (better) | 3.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.1× | 11.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 8.6× (better) | 15.9× |
| FCF yield | 11.6% (better) | 6.3% |
| Fair value | $4.42 | $21.09 |
| Margin of safety | 23.2% (better) | 8.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.5% | 3.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.6% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 17.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 17.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 62.9% (better) | 58.3% |
| Operating margin | −1.4% | 17.4% (better) |
| Net margin | −10.4% | 10.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | 6.0% | 15.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | −18.5% | 16.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −0.98% | 18.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.02 | 0.11 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 7.17 | 0.03 (better) |
| Interest coverage | −0.4× | 6.4× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.75 | 0.96 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −0.07 | 2.23 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 5.4% |
| Payout ratio | – | 94.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 2 |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 5.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 44.1% | 94.4% |
| Held by insiders | 61.5% | 1.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $213K | $110M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 12.0% | 3.0% |
Go deeper
- COTY stock overview
- COTY income statement
- COTY valuation and score
- KVUE stock overview
- KVUE income statement
- KVUE valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.