Coty vs Interparfums
COTY and IPAR side by side, both in soap, detergents, and cleaning preparations; perfumes, cosmetics, and other toilet preparations. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How COTY and IPAR compare
Interparfums is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Coty ($4.3B against $3.6B).
Interparfums grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.6% versus −0.24% for Coty).
Interparfums keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.3% compared with −9.7% at Coty.
Interparfums pays a dividend yielding 2.4%; Coty does not pay one.
Interparfums scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 3 for Coty), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | COTY | IPAR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.6B | $4.3B |
| Share price | $4.06 | $133.19 |
| Change, 1 year | 14.4% | 53.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −60.8% | 43.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.00 | 0.85 |
| Employees | 11K | 662 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 20 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 25.1× |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 2.8× |
| P/B | 1.2× (better) | 4.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.6× | 15.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 8.5× (better) | 17.5× |
| PEG | – | 2.18 |
| FCF yield | 11.8% (better) | 5.7% |
| Fair value | $3.70 | $138.78 |
| Margin of safety | −9.7% | 4.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.24% | 2.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.6% | 22.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 3.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 3.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 34.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 62.6% | 64.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | −1.7% | 17.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −9.7% | 11.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 7.3% | 16.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | −16.7% | 19.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −1.2% | 20.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.89 | 0.22 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 6.71 | 0.29 (better) |
| Interest coverage | −0.6× | 44.3× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.75 | 3.33 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −0.02 | 8.26 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.4% |
| Payout ratio | – | 60.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 5 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 57.5% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.24% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 44.1% | 67.1% |
| Held by insiders | 61.5% | 22.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $213K (better) | −$4.0M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.7% | 7.8% |
Go deeper
- COTY stock overview
- COTY income statement
- COTY valuation and score
- IPAR stock overview
- IPAR income statement
- IPAR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.