Coty vs Haleon
COTY and HLN side by side, both in soap, detergents, and cleaning preparations; perfumes, cosmetics, and other toilet preparations. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How COTY and HLN compare
Coty grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−1.5% versus −1.8% for Haleon).
Haleon keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 15.1% compared with −10.4% at Coty.
Haleon scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 4 for Coty), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | COTY | HLN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.0B | – |
| Share price | $3.40 | $8.66 |
| Change, 1 year | −13.9% | −4.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −63.4% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.05 | 0.15 |
| Employees | 11K | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.5× | – |
| P/B | 1.0× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.1× | – |
| P/FCF | 8.6× | – |
| FCF yield | 11.6% | – |
| Fair value | $4.42 | – |
| Margin of safety | 23.2% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.5% (better) | −1.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.6% (better) | 2.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 15.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 17.8% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 8.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 62.9% | 64.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | −1.4% | 21.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −10.4% | 15.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 6.0% | 21.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | −18.5% | 10.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −0.98% | 7.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.02 | 0.50 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 7.17 | 2.68 (better) |
| Interest coverage | −0.4× | 7.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.75 (better) | 0.69 |
| Altman Z-score | −0.07 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 44.1% | 6.7% |
| Held by insiders | 61.5% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $213K | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 12.0% | – |
Go deeper
- COTY stock overview
- COTY income statement
- COTY valuation and score
- HLN stock overview
- HLN income statement
- HLN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.