Cosmos Health vs Natural Health Trends
COSM and NHTC side by side, both in wholesale trade-non-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How COSM and NHTC compare
Cosmos Health is the larger company, worth 51 times as much as Natural Health Trends ($326M against $6.3M).
Cosmos Health grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (33.8% versus −16.5% for Natural Health Trends).
Natural Health Trends keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −4.2% compared with −33.1% at Cosmos Health.
Natural Health Trends pays a dividend yielding 53.7%; Cosmos Health does not pay one.
Natural Health Trends scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 4 for Cosmos Health), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | COSM | NHTC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $326M | $6.3M |
| Share price | $3.24 | $0.746 |
| Change, 1 year | −77.8% | −79.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.8% | −89.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 5.79 | 0.73 |
| Employees | 163 | 120 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 4.4× | 0.2× (better) |
| P/B | 15.8× | 0.4× (better) |
| FCF yield | −3.0% (better) | −73.7% |
| Fair value | $1.38 | $2.95 |
| Margin of safety | −135% | 74.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 33.8% (better) | −16.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.3% (better) | −8.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 10.3% | 74.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | −24.9% | −5.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −33.1% | −4.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | −13.5% (better) | −13.7% |
| Return on equity | −104% | −6.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −60.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.06 (better) | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −7.8× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.05 | 2.13 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.81 (better) | −0.17 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 53.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 0.00% |
| Buyback yield | −2.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | −2.6% | 53.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 2.1% | 12.2% |
| Held by insiders | 17.4% | 13.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.6M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.1% | 0.61% |
Go deeper
- COSM stock overview
- COSM income statement
- COSM valuation and score
- NHTC stock overview
- NHTC income statement
- NHTC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.