ConocoPhillips vs Imperial Oil
COP and IMO side by side, both in petroleum refining. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How COP and IMO compare
ConocoPhillips grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.6% versus 4.5% for Imperial Oil).
ConocoPhillips keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.7% compared with 8.0% at Imperial Oil.
ConocoPhillips pays a dividend yielding 2.2%; Imperial Oil does not pay one.
ConocoPhillips scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 7 for Imperial Oil), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | COP | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $185B | – |
| Share price | $154.03 | $138.10 |
| Change, 1 year | 74.9% | 49.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 104% | 307% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.47 | 0.45 |
| Employees | 9,900 | 5,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 20.4× | – |
| P/S | 2.9× | – |
| P/B | 2.8× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.6× | – |
| Fair value | $153.11 | – |
| Margin of safety | −0.60% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.6% (better) | 4.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 25.7% (better) | 16.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 1.1% (better) | −11.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 1.3% (better) | −6.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 62.0% | – |
| Net margin | 14.7% (better) | 8.0% |
| FCF margin | – | 9.7% |
| Return on equity | 14.2% | 16.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.36 | 0.14 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.59 | 0.08 (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.54 (better) | 1.38 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.28 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.2% | – |
| Payout ratio | 43.8% | 36.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 9 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 13.5% | 26.8% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 2.9% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 5.1% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 85.1% | 29.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.08% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$145M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.3% | – |
Go deeper
- COP stock overview
- COP income statement
- COP valuation and score
- IMO stock overview
- IMO income statement
- IMO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.