Compass vs Marriott Vacations Worldwide
COMP and VAC side by side, both in real estate. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How COMP and VAC compare
Compass is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as Marriott Vacations Worldwide ($7.8B against $4.0B).
Compass grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (89.8% versus 4.6% for Marriott Vacations Worldwide).
Compass keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.1% compared with −4.7% at Marriott Vacations Worldwide.
Marriott Vacations Worldwide pays a dividend yielding 2.7%; Compass does not pay one.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | COMP | VAC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.8B | $4.0B |
| Share price | $10.26 | $117.51 |
| Change, 1 year | 16.7% | 134% |
| Change, 5 years | −1.6% | −29.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.24 | 1.32 |
| Employees | 3,200 | 3,300 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 6 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 73.3× | – |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 0.8× |
| P/B | 2.5× | 1.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 33.0× | – |
| P/FCF | 26.4× | 24.6× (better) |
| FCF yield | 3.8% | 4.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $2.62 | $93.05 |
| Margin of safety | −292% | −26.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 89.8% (better) | 4.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 13.3% (better) | 11.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −245% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −276% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | −1.4% | – |
| Net margin | 1.1% (better) | −4.7% |
| FCF margin | 2.3% | 3.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 6.8% (better) | −10.9% |
| Return on invested capital | −4.8% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.00 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 7.53 | – |
| Interest coverage | −1.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.12 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.86 (better) | 0.96 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 5 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 42.5% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.62% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 3.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.5% | 92.3% |
| Held by insiders | 6.8% | 25.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.5M (better) | −$82.9M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.9% | 7.4% |
Go deeper
- COMP stock overview
- COMP income statement
- COMP valuation and score
- VAC stock overview
- VAC income statement
- VAC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.