StockData

Collegium Pharmaceutical vs Supernus

COLL and SUPN side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How COLL and SUPN compare

Supernus grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.3% versus 7.7% for Collegium Pharmaceutical).

Supernus keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 32.8% compared with 4.7% at Collegium Pharmaceutical.

Collegium Pharmaceutical scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 6 for Supernus), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCOLLSUPN
Size and price
Market cap$808M–
Share price$24.81$29.45
Change, 1 year−43.0%−4.6%
Change, 5 years31.6%–
Beta (5Y)0.470.69
Employees423838
StockData Score
Total score10 (better)6
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score23 (better)
Performance score4 (better)2
Health score11
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E24.8×–
P/S1.0×–
P/B2.7×–
EV/EBITDA5.3×–
P/FCF2.4×–
FCF yield41.6%–
Fair value$44.75–
Margin of safety44.6%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)7.7%16.3% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average20.3%–
Net income growth (TTM)−34.7%252% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)−37.9%253% (better)
EPS growth, 5Y average17.9%–
Profitability
Gross margin59.0%85.0% (better)
Operating margin15.2%40.6% (better)
Net margin4.7%32.8% (better)
FCF margin41.3% (better)2.3%
Return on equity13.4%–
Return on invested capital160%–
Financial health
Net debt / EBITDA–0.32
Interest coverage1.6×32.8× (better)
Current ratio1.01 (better)0.61
Altman Z-score0.81–
Piotroski F-score6 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions121%104%
Held by insiders4.3%16.4%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$4.4M−$2.5M (better)
Short interest, % of float16.7%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.