Coca-Cola Consolidated vs Primo Brands
COKE and PRMB side by side, both in beverages. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How COKE and PRMB compare
Coca-Cola Consolidated is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as Primo Brands ($14.1B against $8.7B).
Coca-Cola Consolidated grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.2% versus 4.5% for Primo Brands).
Coca-Cola Consolidated keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.5% compared with 3.1% at Primo Brands.
Both pay dividends: Coca-Cola Consolidated yields 0.47% and Primo Brands 1.9%.
Coca-Cola Consolidated scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 8 for Primo Brands), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | COKE | PRMB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $14.1B | $8.7B |
| Share price | $211.84 | $24.00 |
| Change, 1 year | 45.6% | 54.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 279% | 29.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.53 | 0.80 |
| Employees | 17K | 13K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 42.9× |
| P/S | 1.8× | 1.3× (better) |
| P/B | – | 2.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.3× | 11.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 25.5× | 21.0× (better) |
| FCF yield | 3.9% | 4.8% (better) |
| Fair value | $212.35 | $23.64 |
| Margin of safety | 0.24% (better) | −1.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 10.2% (better) | 4.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.6% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −4.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 38.9% (better) | 29.4% |
| Operating margin | 13.1% (better) | 8.6% |
| Net margin | 7.5% (better) | 3.1% |
| FCF margin | 7.1% (better) | 6.1% |
| Return on equity | 90.0% (better) | 6.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 41.7% (better) | 5.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 1.69 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.79 (better) | 3.94 |
| Interest coverage | – | 1.8× |
| Current ratio | 1.33 (better) | 1.11 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.12 (better) | 1.24 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.47% | 1.9% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 12.2% | 81.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 1 |
| Buyback yield | – | 2.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.47% | 4.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 62.3% | 110% |
| Held by insiders | 15.9% | 59.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $0 (better) | −$993M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.5% | 20.2% |
Go deeper
- COKE stock overview
- COKE income statement
- COKE valuation and score
- PRMB stock overview
- PRMB income statement
- PRMB valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.