Coca-Cola Consolidated vs National Beverage
COKE and FIZZ side by side, both in beverages. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How COKE and FIZZ compare
Coca-Cola Consolidated is the larger company, worth 4.2 times as much as National Beverage ($14.0B against $3.3B).
Coca-Cola Consolidated grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.7% versus −1.8% for National Beverage).
National Beverage keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.8% compared with 7.2% at Coca-Cola Consolidated.
Both pay dividends: Coca-Cola Consolidated yields 0.48% and National Beverage 9.2%.
National Beverage scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 15 for Coca-Cola Consolidated), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | COKE | FIZZ |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $14.0B | $3.3B |
| Share price | $210.30 | $35.30 |
| Change, 1 year | 64.3% | 8.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 385% | −43.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.53 | 0.53 |
| Employees | 17K | 1,677 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 6 | 6 |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 19.0× |
| P/S | 1.8× (better) | 2.8× |
| P/B | – | 9.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.6× | 13.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | 21.7× | 20.4× (better) |
| PEG | – | 2.15 |
| FCF yield | 4.6% | 4.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $229.58 | $42.13 |
| Margin of safety | 8.4% | 16.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 10.7% (better) | −1.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.6% (better) | 1.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −6.1% | −5.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −6.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 1.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 39.1% (better) | 36.2% |
| Operating margin | 13.0% | 18.4% (better) |
| Net margin | 7.2% | 14.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 8.4% | 13.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | 97.3% (better) | 40.1% |
| Return on invested capital | 39.8% | 64.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.95 | – |
| Current ratio | 1.21 | 2.39 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.07 | 13.72 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.48% | 9.2% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 13.9% | 174% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.48% | 9.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 62.3% | 26.3% |
| Held by insiders | 15.9% | 0.22% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.4B | $7.9K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.9% | 4.8% |
Go deeper
- COKE stock overview
- COKE income statement
- COKE valuation and score
- FIZZ stock overview
- FIZZ income statement
- FIZZ valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.