Cohen vs Oppenheimer
COHN and OPY side by side, both in security brokers, dealers, and flotation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How COHN and OPY compare
Oppenheimer is the larger company, worth 30 times as much as Cohen ($956M against $31.5M).
On earnings, Cohen is cheaper: it trades at 4.4× trailing earnings, against 12.1× for Oppenheimer.
Cohen grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (37.2% versus 13.9% for Oppenheimer).
Cohen keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.6% compared with 4.9% at Oppenheimer.
Both pay dividends: Cohen yields 38.0% and Oppenheimer 0.85%.
Oppenheimer scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 13 for Cohen), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | COHN | OPY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $31.5M | $956M |
| Share price | $9.74 | $89.25 |
| Change, 1 year | −25.6% | 28.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −40.4% | 71.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.64 | 0.82 |
| Employees | 100 | 2,947 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 4.4× (better) | 12.1× |
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 0.5× |
| P/B | 0.4× (better) | 1.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.2× (better) | 7.3× |
| P/FCF | – | 16.7× |
| PEG | – | 0.17 |
| FCF yield | −8.8% | 6.0% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $113.67 |
| Margin of safety | – | 21.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 37.2% (better) | 13.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.2% (better) | 6.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 354% (better) | 2.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −4.3% | −0.94% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −10.7% | 7.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 19.1% (better) | 7.2% |
| Net margin | 7.6% (better) | 4.9% |
| FCF margin | −1.0% | 3.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 33.3% (better) | 9.1% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 9.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 2.5× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.42 | 1.04 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 38.0% (better) | 0.85% |
| Payout ratio | 38.7% | 21.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | −13.4% |
| Buyback yield | −12.4% | 0.24% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 25.5% (better) | 1.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 4.8% | 41.7% |
| Held by insiders | – | 6.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$219K (better) | −$424K |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 1.1% |
Go deeper
- COHN stock overview
- COHN income statement
- COHN valuation and score
- OPY stock overview
- OPY income statement
- OPY valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.