51Talk Online Education vs 17 Education & Technology
COE and YQ side by side, both in services-educational services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How COE and YQ compare
51Talk Online Education grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (88.6% versus −44.0% for 17 Education & Technology).
51Talk Online Education keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −17.6% compared with −146% at 17 Education & Technology.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | COE | YQ |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $11.33 | $2.69 |
| Change, 1 year | −77.1% | −46.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 22.1% | −85.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.55 | 0.70 |
| Employees | 42 | 1,017 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 6 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 88.6% (better) | −44.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −21.2% (better) | −39.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 73.9% (better) | 47.8% |
| Operating margin | −15.1% (better) | −154% |
| Net margin | −17.6% (better) | −146% |
| FCF margin | 10.0% | 28.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | −45.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 0.63 | 1.87 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.10% | 0.01% |
| Held by insiders | 56.4% | 24.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $230M (better) | $178K |
Go deeper
- COE stock overview
- COE income statement
- COE valuation and score
- YQ stock overview
- YQ income statement
- YQ valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.