Coda Octopus vs MIND Technology
CODA and MIND side by side, both in measuring, analyzing, and controlling instruments; photographic, medical and optical goods; watches and clocks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CODA and MIND compare
Coda Octopus is the larger company, worth 3.4 times as much as MIND Technology ($98.5M against $28.6M).
Coda Octopus grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.5% versus −28.5% for MIND Technology).
Coda Octopus keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.6% compared with −6.8% at MIND Technology.
Coda Octopus scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 10 for MIND Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CODA | MIND |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $98.5M | $28.6M |
| Share price | $8.73 | $3.15 |
| Change, 1 year | −3.5% | −77.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 7.1% | −78.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.54 | 0.87 |
| Employees | 100 | 157 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 19.8× | – |
| P/S | 3.4× | 0.8× (better) |
| P/B | 1.6× | 0.7× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.1× | – |
| P/FCF | 17.6× | – |
| FCF yield | 5.7% (better) | −13.5% |
| Fair value | $10.65 | $8.02 |
| Margin of safety | 18.0% | 60.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 17.5% (better) | −28.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.8% | 14.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 47.0% (better) | −155% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 46.7% (better) | −108% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 4.3% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 66.1% (better) | 42.2% |
| Operating margin | 20.1% (better) | −2.7% |
| Net margin | 17.6% (better) | −6.8% |
| FCF margin | 19.6% (better) | −11.1% |
| Return on equity | 8.4% (better) | −6.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 13.6% (better) | −3.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 10.06 (better) | 6.92 |
| Altman Z-score | 11.22 (better) | 1.03 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 25.3% | 14.3% |
| Held by insiders | 31.9% | 1.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.3M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.8% | 2.6% |
Go deeper
- CODA stock overview
- CODA income statement
- CODA valuation and score
- MIND stock overview
- MIND income statement
- MIND valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.