Vita Coco vs National Beverage
COCO and FIZZ side by side, both in beverages. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How COCO and FIZZ compare
Vita Coco and National Beverage are about the same size, with market caps of $3.7B and $3.4B.
On earnings, National Beverage is cheaper: it trades at 19.8× trailing earnings, against 32.8× for Vita Coco.
Vita Coco grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (26.0% versus −1.8% for National Beverage).
Vita Coco keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 15.7% compared with 14.8% at National Beverage.
National Beverage pays a dividend yielding 8.8%; Vita Coco does not pay one.
Vita Coco scores higher on the StockData Score (21 against 18 for National Beverage), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | COCO | FIZZ |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.7B | $3.4B |
| Share price | $65.31 | $36.74 |
| Change, 1 year | 56.6% | 12.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 315% | −38.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.11 | 0.52 |
| Employees | 336 | 1,677 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 21 (better) | 18 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 6 | 6 |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 32.8× | 19.8× (better) |
| P/S | 4.9× | 2.9× (better) |
| P/B | 8.7× (better) | 9.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 23.0× | 13.8× (better) |
| P/FCF | 25.9× | 21.2× (better) |
| PEG | 0.32 (better) | 2.23 |
| FCF yield | 3.9% | 4.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $66.64 | $42.31 |
| Margin of safety | 2.0% | 13.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 26.0% (better) | −1.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 14.4% (better) | 1.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 74.2% (better) | −5.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 73.0% (better) | −6.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 16.3% (better) | 1.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 41.0% (better) | 36.2% |
| Operating margin | 19.9% (better) | 18.4% |
| Net margin | 15.7% (better) | 14.8% |
| FCF margin | 18.8% (better) | 13.7% |
| Return on equity | 32.0% | 40.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 59.8% | 64.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 2.48 (better) | 2.39 |
| Altman Z-score | 11.32 | 14.10 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 8.8% |
| Payout ratio | – | 174% |
| Buyback yield | 1.7% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.7% | 8.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 86.8% | 26.3% |
| Held by insiders | 22.7% | 0.22% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$72.2M | $7.9K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 16.1% | 4.6% |
Go deeper
- COCO stock overview
- COCO income statement
- COCO valuation and score
- FIZZ stock overview
- FIZZ income statement
- FIZZ valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.