PC Connection vs Td Synnex
CNXN and SNX side by side, both in professional and commercial equipment and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CNXN and SNX compare
Td Synnex is the larger company, worth 8.6 times as much as PC Connection ($18.9B against $2.2B).
On earnings, Td Synnex is cheaper: it trades at 14.4× trailing earnings, against 23.0× for PC Connection.
Td Synnex grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (24.1% versus 3.2% for PC Connection).
PC Connection keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.2% compared with 1.8% at Td Synnex.
Both pay dividends: PC Connection yields 0.86% and Td Synnex 0.81%.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CNXN | SNX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.2B | $18.9B |
| Share price | $86.83 | $236.62 |
| Change, 1 year | 42.6% | 52.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 72.9% | 107% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.75 | 1.05 |
| Employees | 2,525 | 270K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 | 15 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 23.0× | 14.4× (better) |
| P/S | 0.7× | 0.3× (better) |
| P/B | 2.3× | 2.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.6× | 9.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 64.4× | – |
| PEG | – | 1.05 |
| FCF yield | 1.6% (better) | −4.3% |
| Fair value | $71.42 | $249.06 |
| Margin of safety | −21.6% | 5.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.2% | 24.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.1% | 25.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 11.4% | 71.3% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 15.2% | 78.0% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 9.1% (better) | −0.51% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 18.9% (better) | 6.9% |
| Operating margin | 3.9% (better) | 2.7% |
| Net margin | 3.2% (better) | 1.8% |
| FCF margin | 1.1% (better) | −1.1% |
| Return on equity | 10.4% | 14.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 15.0% (better) | 12.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.59 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 1.93 |
| Interest coverage | – | 6.4× |
| Current ratio | 2.88 (better) | 1.19 |
| Altman Z-score | 6.77 (better) | 2.62 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.86% (better) | 0.81% |
| Payout ratio | 18.4% | 11.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 5 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 34.5% |
| Buyback yield | 0.83% | 2.5% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.7% | 3.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 41.3% | 91.8% |
| Held by insiders | 100% | 0.68% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$15.1M (better) | −$39.5M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 2.3% |
Go deeper
- CNXN stock overview
- CNXN income statement
- CNXN valuation and score
- SNX stock overview
- SNX income statement
- SNX valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.