Concentrix vs Lyft
CNXC and LYFT side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CNXC and LYFT compare
Lyft is the larger company, worth 3.3 times as much as Concentrix ($6.5B against $2.0B).
Lyft grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.1% versus 2.6% for Concentrix).
Lyft keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 40.7% compared with −24.0% at Concentrix.
Concentrix pays a dividend yielding 4.4%; Lyft does not pay one.
Lyft scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 9 for Concentrix), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CNXC | LYFT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.0B | $6.5B |
| Share price | $32.76 | $17.29 |
| Change, 1 year | −5.1% | −27.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −82.4% | −63.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.02 | 1.66 |
| Employees | 455K | 3,913 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 2.5× |
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 0.9× |
| P/B | 1.1× (better) | 2.2× |
| P/FCF | 3.5× | – |
| FCF yield | 28.7% | – |
| Fair value | $100.88 | – |
| Margin of safety | 67.5% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.6% | 10.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 15.8% | 21.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −856% | 1765% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −921% | 1806% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 34.1% | 47.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | −20.9% | −2.3% (better) |
| Net margin | −24.0% | 40.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.8% | – |
| Return on equity | −78.2% | 158% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −22.3% | −14.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 2.47 | 0.35 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | −6.8× |
| Current ratio | 1.23 (better) | 0.60 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.39 (better) | −0.05 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.4% | – |
| Buyback yield | 5.0% | 8.4% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 9.4% (better) | 8.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 112% | 111% |
| Held by insiders | 13.1% | 6.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$133M | −$7.2M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 15.1% | 22.8% |
Go deeper
- CNXC stock overview
- CNXC income statement
- CNXC valuation and score
- LYFT stock overview
- LYFT income statement
- LYFT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.