Concentrix vs Global Payments
CNXC and GPN side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CNXC and GPN compare
Global Payments is the larger company, worth 14 times as much as Concentrix ($25.6B against $1.8B).
Global Payments grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (32.5% versus 2.6% for Concentrix).
Global Payments keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −9.1% compared with −24.0% at Concentrix.
Both pay dividends: Concentrix yields 4.8% and Global Payments 1.0%.
Global Payments scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 9 for Concentrix), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CNXC | GPN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.8B | $25.6B |
| Share price | $30.13 | $96.84 |
| Change, 1 year | −29.4% | 22.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −82.8% | −29.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.01 | 1.22 |
| Employees | 455K | 26K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 2.5× |
| P/B | 1.0× (better) | 1.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 11.8× |
| P/FCF | 3.2× (better) | 31.1× |
| FCF yield | 31.3% (better) | 3.2% |
| Fair value | $101.99 | $128.18 |
| Margin of safety | 70.5% (better) | 24.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.6% | 32.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 15.8% (better) | 0.75% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −856% | −165% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −921% | −152% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 24.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 34.1% | 63.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | −20.9% | 12.4% (better) |
| Net margin | −24.0% | −9.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.8% | 8.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | −78.2% | −4.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −22.3% | 2.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 2.47 | 0.97 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 4.64 |
| Interest coverage | – | 1.5× |
| Current ratio | 1.23 (better) | 0.82 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.38 | 0.66 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.8% (better) | 1.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 5.1% |
| Buyback yield | 5.4% | 6.2% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 10.2% (better) | 7.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 112% | 107% |
| Held by insiders | 13.1% | 16.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$133M | −$153K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 17.3% | 6.8% |
Go deeper
- CNXC stock overview
- CNXC income statement
- CNXC valuation and score
- GPN stock overview
- GPN income statement
- GPN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.