CNX Resources vs Comstock Resources
CNX and CRK side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CNX and CRK compare
CNX Resources is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Comstock Resources ($5.2B against $4.5B).
On earnings, CNX Resources is cheaper: it trades at 5.9× trailing earnings, against 10.4× for Comstock Resources.
CNX Resources grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (47.0% versus 17.6% for Comstock Resources).
CNX Resources keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 35.2% compared with 19.8% at Comstock Resources.
CNX Resources scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 6 for Comstock Resources), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CNX | CRK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.2B | $4.5B |
| Share price | $36.56 | $15.18 |
| Change, 1 year | −1.2% | −39.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 162% | 79.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.57 | 0.97 |
| Employees | 390 | 252 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 5.9× (better) | 10.4× |
| P/S | 2.0× (better) | 2.1× |
| P/B | 1.1× (better) | 1.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 6.7× |
| P/FCF | 10.8× | – |
| FCF yield | 9.2% (better) | −18.4% |
| Fair value | $52.53 | $11.84 |
| Margin of safety | 30.4% (better) | −28.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 47.0% (better) | 17.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.2% | 20.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 212% | 641% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 332% | 484% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 28.4% |
| Net margin | 35.2% (better) | 19.8% |
| FCF margin | 18.6% (better) | −38.7% |
| Return on equity | 20.4% (better) | 16.9% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 8.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.47 (better) | 1.29 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.67 |
| Interest coverage | – | 2.7× |
| Current ratio | 1.08 (better) | 0.60 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.37 (better) | 1.28 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Buyback yield | 10.2% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 10.2% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 94.1% | 25.1% |
| Held by insiders | 14.2% | 2.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.9M | −$1.0M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 14.2% | 9.2% |
Go deeper
- CNX stock overview
- CNX income statement
- CNX valuation and score
- CRK stock overview
- CRK income statement
- CRK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.