StockData

Canadian Natural Resources vs Woodside Energy

CNQ and WDS side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CNQ and WDS compare

Canadian Natural Resources grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.7% versus −1.5% for Woodside Energy).

Woodside Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 2 for Canadian Natural Resources), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCNQWDS
Size and price
Share price$56.11$23.55
Change, 1 year74.5%47.5%
Change, 5 years158%39.8%
Beta (5Y)0.450.69
Employees11K4,667
StockData Score
Total score26 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score02 (better)
Health score14 (better)
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)8.7% (better)−1.5%
Revenue growth, 5Y average18.1%29.2% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)–−23.9%
EPS growth (TTM)81.1% (better)−24.0%
Profitability
Gross margin–34.9%
Operating margin–30.0%
Net margin–20.9%
Return on equity–7.6%
Return on invested capital–7.5%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.33
Net debt / EBITDA0.67 (better)0.70
Interest coverage–13.0×
Current ratio0.951.59 (better)
Piotroski F-score–4
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio–74.0%
Years of dividend growth–0
Dividend growth, 5Y average–24.1%
Ownership
Held by institutions71.9%1.6%
Held by insiders0.00%0.03%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$535K
Superinvestors holding1–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.