Canadian Natural Resources vs TotalEnergies
CNQ and TTE side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CNQ and TTE compare
Canadian Natural Resources grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.7% versus −6.2% for TotalEnergies).
TotalEnergies scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 2 for Canadian Natural Resources), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CNQ | TTE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $56.11 | $94.03 |
| Change, 1 year | 74.5% | 51.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 158% | 88.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.45 | 0.32 |
| Employees | 11K | 4,900 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.7% (better) | −6.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 18.1% (better) | 7.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −16.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 81.1% (better) | −13.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | – | 6.5% |
| Return on equity | – | 10.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.49 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.67 | – |
| Current ratio | 0.95 | 1.06 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | – | 64.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 71.9% | 46.3% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 0.22% |
Go deeper
- CNQ stock overview
- CNQ income statement
- CNQ valuation and score
- TTE stock overview
- TTE income statement
- TTE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.