StockData

CN Energy vs LanzaTech Global

CNEY and LNZA side by side, both in chemicals and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CNEY and LNZA compare

LanzaTech Global grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (43.8% versus −30.2% for CN Energy).

LanzaTech Global keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 296% compared with −31.3% at CN Energy.

LanzaTech Global scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 3 for CN Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCNEYLNZA
Size and price
Market cap–$50.4M
Share price$0.467$3.85
Change, 1 year−72.7%−78.6%
Change, 5 years−100.0%−99.6%
Beta (5Y)1.050.97
Employees2192
StockData Score
Total score312 (better)
Valuation score02 (better)
Growth score12 (better)
Performance score13 (better)
Health score15 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E–0.3×
P/S–0.9×
P/B–0.2×
FCF yield–−67.1%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−30.2%43.8% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average23.3%–
Profitability
Gross margin1.8%–
Operating margin−30.9% (better)−61.0%
Net margin−31.3%296% (better)
FCF margin−5.5% (better)−58.0%
Return on equity−13.9%146% (better)
Return on invested capital−10.8% (better)−37.2%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Interest coverage−65.3×–
Current ratio2.77 (better)2.48
Altman Z-score–−3.22
Piotroski F-score4 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions1.4%25.4%
Held by insiders12.7%–
Insider net buying, 12 months–$4.3M
Short interest, % of float3.7%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.