ZW Data Action Technologies vs Professional Diversity Network
CNET and IPDN side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CNET and IPDN compare
Professional Diversity Network is the larger company, worth 4.0 times as much as ZW Data Action Technologies ($13.9M against $3.5M).
Professional Diversity Network grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−5.1% versus −55.1% for ZW Data Action Technologies).
ZW Data Action Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −23.9% compared with −144% at Professional Diversity Network.
Professional Diversity Network pays a dividend yielding 3.1%; ZW Data Action Technologies does not pay one.
ZW Data Action Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 8 for Professional Diversity Network), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CNET | IPDN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.5M | $13.9M |
| Share price | $0.946 | $0.965 |
| Change, 1 year | −50.5% | −98.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −96.2% | −99.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.43 | 1.04 |
| Employees | 13 | 34 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 1.0× (better) | 2.3× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 1.0× |
| FCF yield | −29.7% | −16.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $1.94 | $8.98 |
| Margin of safety | 51.2% | 89.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −55.1% | −5.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −34.5% | 8.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 6.4% | 37.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | −28.8% (better) | −144% |
| Net margin | −23.9% (better) | −144% |
| FCF margin | −29.9% (better) | −36.9% |
| Return on equity | −21.7% (better) | −95.7% |
| Return on invested capital | −29.6% (better) | −76.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 1.45 (better) | 0.78 |
| Altman Z-score | −8.71 | −8.31 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 3.1% |
| Buyback yield | – | −51.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% (better) | −48.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.67% | 0.03% |
| Held by insiders | 9.7% | 16.3% |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.22% | 0.49% |
Go deeper
- CNET stock overview
- CNET income statement
- CNET valuation and score
- IPDN stock overview
- IPDN income statement
- IPDN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.