StockData

Conduent vs CoStar

CNDT and CSGP side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CNDT and CSGP compare

CoStar is the larger company, worth 51 times as much as Conduent ($12.2B against $240M).

CoStar grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (22.0% versus −5.7% for Conduent).

CoStar scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 4 for Conduent), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCNDTCSGP
Size and price
Market cap$240M$12.2B
Share price$1.54$30.17
Change, 1 year−34.7%−57.2%
Change, 5 years−75.2%−63.8%
Beta (5Y)1.171.04
Employees51K8,000
StockData Score
Total score49 (better)
Valuation score22
Growth score12 (better)
Performance score00
Health score15 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E–159×
P/S0.1× (better)3.4×
P/B–1.5×
EV/EBITDA0.4× (better)30.4×
P/FCF–43.7×
FCF yield−20.5%2.3% (better)
Fair value–$16.48
Margin of safety–−83.1%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−5.7%22.0% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−6.1%14.4% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)–−29.3%
EPS growth (TTM)−2600%−24.0% (better)
EPS growth, 5Y average–−49.2%
Profitability
Gross margin18.4%78.7% (better)
Operating margin–2.2%
Net margin–2.1%
FCF margin−1.8%7.9% (better)
Return on equity–0.89%
Return on invested capital–0.83%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.13
Net debt / EBITDA−2.56−0.69
Interest coverage–3.2×
Current ratio1.552.21 (better)
Altman Z-score−0.183.83 (better)
Piotroski F-score–5
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–8.4%
Shareholder yield0.00%8.4% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions73.6%102%
Held by insiders17.1%1.3%
Insider net buying, 12 months$655K$8.0M (better)
Superinvestors holding12 (better)
Short interest, % of float3.3%3.3%

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.