Core Molding Technologies vs Deswell Industries
CMT and DSWL side by side, both in miscellaneous plastics products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CMT and DSWL compare
Core Molding Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.4% versus −9.3% for Deswell Industries).
Deswell Industries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.3% compared with 2.4% at Core Molding Technologies.
Core Molding Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 11 for Deswell Industries), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CMT | DSWL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $196M | – |
| Share price | $22.17 | $3.02 |
| Change, 1 year | 16.0% | −14.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 135% | −37.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.62 | 0.26 |
| Employees | 1,239 | 854 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 27.4× | – |
| P/S | 0.7× | – |
| P/B | 1.2× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.6× | – |
| FCF yield | −9.8% | – |
| Fair value | $22.39 | – |
| Margin of safety | 1.00% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.4% (better) | −9.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.3% (better) | −1.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −13.5% | −4.6% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −13.8% | −4.3% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 5.7% (better) | 5.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 17.3% | 22.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | 2.9% | 3.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 2.4% | 17.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | −6.7% | 7.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | 4.4% | 10.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 4.7% (better) | 3.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.27 | – |
| Interest coverage | 49.1× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.86 | 5.25 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.19 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | – | 30.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 2.1% |
| Buyback yield | 1.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.6% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 72.7% | 6.1% |
| Held by insiders | 14.2% | 71.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$328K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.6% | 0.03% |
Go deeper
- CMT stock overview
- CMT income statement
- CMT valuation and score
- DSWL stock overview
- DSWL income statement
- DSWL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.