StockData

Cimpress vs Pearson

CMPR and PSO side by side, both in printing, publishing, and allied industries. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CMPR and PSO compare

Cimpress grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.0% versus 0.70% for Pearson).

Pearson keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.4% compared with 2.2% at Cimpress.

Cimpress scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 8 for Pearson), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCMPRPSO
Size and price
Market cap$1.4B–
Share price$57.02$17.37
Change, 1 year−14.6%22.2%
Change, 5 years−38.3%113%
Beta (5Y)1.390.37
Employees5004,722
StockData Score
Total score10 (better)8
Valuation score6 (better)0
Growth score22
Performance score24 (better)
Health score02 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E17.0×–
P/S0.4×–
EV/EBITDA7.6×–
P/FCF7.3×–
FCF yield13.7%–
Fair value$82.98–
Margin of safety31.3%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)10.0% (better)0.70%
Revenue growth, 5Y average7.7% (better)1.0%
Net income growth (TTM)144% (better)−22.8%
EPS growth (TTM)155% (better)−20.2%
EPS growth, 5Y average–−59.0%
Profitability
Gross margin45.6%52.0% (better)
Operating margin6.0%14.2% (better)
Net margin2.2%9.4% (better)
FCF margin5.0%–
Return on equity–8.7%
Return on invested capital16.6% (better)7.6%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.41
Net debt / EBITDA3.932.26 (better)
Interest coverage–5.2×
Current ratio0.63–
Altman Z-score2.36–
Piotroski F-score8 (better)5
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio–47.8%
Buyback yield3.4%–
Shareholder yield3.4%–
Ownership
Held by institutions87.7%4.2%
Held by insiders28.8%31.8%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$9.0M–
Short interest, % of float13.2%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.