Cimpress vs Deluxe
CMPR and DLX side by side, both in printing, publishing, and allied industries. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CMPR and DLX compare
Cimpress and Deluxe are about the same size, with market caps of $1.4B and $1.2B.
On earnings, Deluxe is cheaper: it trades at 15.6× trailing earnings, against 17.0× for Cimpress.
Cimpress grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.0% versus 0.37% for Deluxe).
Deluxe keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.8% compared with 2.2% at Cimpress.
Deluxe pays a dividend yielding 4.5%; Cimpress does not pay one.
Deluxe scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 10 for Cimpress), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CMPR | DLX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.4B | $1.2B |
| Share price | $57.28 | $26.78 |
| Change, 1 year | −12.0% | 29.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −28.2% | −25.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.43 | 1.08 |
| Employees | 500 | 4,571 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.0× | 15.6× (better) |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 0.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.6× (better) | 8.2× |
| P/FCF | 7.4× | 5.7× (better) |
| PEG | – | 2.48 |
| FCF yield | 13.5% | 17.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $80.28 | $27.31 |
| Margin of safety | 28.7% (better) | 1.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 10.0% (better) | 0.37% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.7% (better) | 3.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 144% (better) | −3.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 155% (better) | −6.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 74.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 45.6% | 52.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | 6.0% | 10.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 2.2% | 3.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.0% | 10.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 16.6% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.93 (better) | 5.04 |
| Interest coverage | – | 1.9× |
| Current ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.36 (better) | 1.40 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 4.5% |
| Payout ratio | – | 70.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 0.00% |
| Buyback yield | 3.4% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 3.4% | 4.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 86.7% | 88.0% |
| Held by insiders | 28.5% | 3.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7.7M | $3.8K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 12.0% | 9.2% |
Go deeper
- CMPR stock overview
- CMPR income statement
- CMPR valuation and score
- DLX stock overview
- DLX income statement
- DLX valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.