Compass Minerals International vs Martin Marietta Materials
CMP and MLM side by side, both in mining & quarrying of nonmetallic minerals (no fuels). Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CMP and MLM compare
Martin Marietta Materials is the larger company, worth 33 times as much as Compass Minerals International ($32.5B against $979M).
On earnings, Martin Marietta Materials is cheaper: it trades at 13.3× trailing earnings, against 54.2× for Compass Minerals International.
Martin Marietta Materials grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.8% versus 5.5% for Compass Minerals International).
Martin Marietta Materials keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 36.7% compared with 1.4% at Compass Minerals International.
Martin Marietta Materials pays a dividend yielding 0.62%; Compass Minerals International does not pay one.
Martin Marietta Materials scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 8 for Compass Minerals International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CMP | MLM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $979M | $32.5B |
| Share price | $23.31 | $540.41 |
| Change, 1 year | 35.4% | −12.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −67.8% | 31.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.04 | 0.91 |
| Employees | 1,849 | 9,600 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 54.2× | 13.3× (better) |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 4.9× |
| P/B | 3.7× | 2.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.4× (better) | 18.5× |
| P/FCF | 12.6× (better) | 40.1× |
| PEG | – | 1.25 |
| FCF yield | 8.0% (better) | 2.5% |
| Fair value | $24.16 | $643.33 |
| Margin of safety | 3.5% | 16.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.5% | 14.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.9% | 5.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 123% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 126% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 10.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 17.2% | 28.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 8.9% | 20.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.4% | 36.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 6.0% | 12.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 7.2% | 23.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.0% | 6.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 2.72 | 0.52 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.97 | 2.82 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 1.7× | 5.9× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.01 (better) | 1.41 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.94 | 3.08 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.62% |
| Payout ratio | – | 8.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 8 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 7.7% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.62% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.6% | 98.7% |
| Held by insiders | 1.1% | 19.1% |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 4 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.0% | 6.6% |
Go deeper
- CMP stock overview
- CMP income statement
- CMP valuation and score
- MLM stock overview
- MLM income statement
- MLM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.