Compass Minerals International vs Intrepid Potash
CMP and IPI side by side, both in mining & quarrying of nonmetallic minerals (no fuels). Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CMP and IPI compare
Compass Minerals International is the larger company, worth 2.2 times as much as Intrepid Potash ($969M against $444M).
On earnings, Intrepid Potash is cheaper: it trades at 18.0× trailing earnings, against 53.7× for Compass Minerals International.
Intrepid Potash keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.0% compared with 1.4% at Compass Minerals International.
Intrepid Potash scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 7 for Compass Minerals International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CMP | IPI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $969M | $444M |
| Share price | $23.08 | $32.97 |
| Change, 1 year | 31.1% | 25.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −56.1% | −19.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.03 | 0.77 |
| Employees | 1,849 | 478 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 53.7× | 18.0× (better) |
| P/S | 0.7× (better) | 1.5× |
| P/B | 3.7× | 0.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.3× | 5.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | 12.4× (better) | 17.4× |
| FCF yield | 8.0% (better) | 5.8% |
| Fair value | $22.73 | $43.01 |
| Margin of safety | −1.6% | 23.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.5% | – |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 17.2% | 21.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 8.9% (better) | 4.2% |
| Net margin | 1.4% | 8.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 6.0% | 8.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 7.2% (better) | 4.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 6.0% (better) | 3.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 2.72 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.97 | – |
| Interest coverage | 1.7× | 503× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.01 | 5.96 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.94 | 2.65 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.6% | 64.7% |
| Held by insiders | 1.2% | 21.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$217K |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.0% | 4.2% |
Go deeper
- CMP stock overview
- CMP income statement
- CMP valuation and score
- IPI stock overview
- IPI income statement
- IPI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.