StockData

Caledonia Mining vs Namib Minerals

CMCL and NAMM side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CMCL and NAMM compare

Caledonia Mining grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (46.2% versus −3.8% for Namib Minerals).

Caledonia Mining scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 2 for Namib Minerals), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCMCLNAMM
Size and price
Share price$20.97$0.727
Change, 1 year−28.0%−48.5%
Change, 5 years55.0%−92.5%
Beta (5Y)0.91−0.14
Employees2,3571,500
StockData Score
Total score11 (better)2
Valuation score00
Growth score4 (better)0
Performance score5 (better)0
Health score22
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)46.2% (better)−3.8%
Revenue growth, 5Y average21.8%–
Net income growth (TTM)209%–
EPS growth (TTM)211%2529% (better)
EPS growth, 5Y average12.5%–
Profitability
Gross margin51.2% (better)41.4%
Operating margin41.0%–
Net margin20.6%–
FCF margin16.4% (better)3.1%
Return on equity21.7%–
Return on invested capital41.9%–
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.09
Net debt / EBITDA–0.03
Interest coverage31.2×–
Current ratio5.73 (better)0.32
Piotroski F-score8–
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio36.1%–
Ownership
Held by institutions48.0%–
Held by insiders26.6%85.8%
Insider net buying, 12 months$741K–
Short interest, % of float12.3%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.