StockData

Caledonia Mining vs McEwen

CMCL and MUX side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CMCL and MUX compare

Caledonia Mining grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (46.2% versus 45.1% for McEwen).

Caledonia Mining scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 8 for McEwen), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCMCLMUX
Size and price
Market cap–$730M
Share price$20.97$11.90
Change, 1 year−28.0%−32.7%
Change, 5 years55.0%8.2%
Beta (5Y)0.911.46
Employees2,357486
StockData Score
Total score11 (better)8
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score4 (better)3
Performance score5 (better)0
Health score22
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E–20.5×
P/S–3.0×
EV/EBITDA–10.1×
Fair value–$12.82
Margin of safety–7.2%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)46.2% (better)45.1%
Revenue growth, 5Y average21.8% (better)13.5%
Net income growth (TTM)209%–
EPS growth (TTM)211%–
EPS growth, 5Y average12.5%–
Profitability
Gross margin51.2% (better)30.2%
Operating margin41.0% (better)20.6%
Net margin20.6%–
FCF margin16.4%–
Return on equity21.7%–
Return on invested capital41.9%–
Financial health
Net debt / EBITDA–0.85
Interest coverage31.2×–
Current ratio5.73 (better)1.34
Altman Z-score–0.08
Piotroski F-score8 (better)6
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio36.1%–
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions48.0%56.4%
Held by insiders26.6%–
Insider net buying, 12 months$741K (better)−$41.0K
Short interest, % of float12.3%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.