Catalyst Bancorp vs Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana
CLST and HFBL side by side, both in savings institutions. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CLST and HFBL compare
Catalyst Bancorp and Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana are about the same size, with market caps of $70.9M and $72.6M.
On earnings, Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana is cheaper: it trades at 11.3× trailing earnings, against 31.9× for Catalyst Bancorp.
Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.8% versus −1.8% for Catalyst Bancorp).
Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 25.6% compared with 18.0% at Catalyst Bancorp.
Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana pays a dividend yielding 2.4%; Catalyst Bancorp does not pay one.
Home Federal Bancorp, Inc. of Louisiana scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 7 for Catalyst Bancorp), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CLST | HFBL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $70.9M | $72.6M |
| Share price | $17.57 | $23.95 |
| Change, 1 year | 19.1% | 51.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 27.4% | 20.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.16 | 0.09 |
| Employees | 49 | 72 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 31.9× | 11.3× (better) |
| P/S | 6.3× | 2.9× (better) |
| P/B | 0.9× (better) | 1.2× |
| P/FCF | 21.9× | – |
| PEG | 0.23 (better) | 3.03 |
| FCF yield | 4.6% | – |
| Fair value | $15.06 | $22.73 |
| Margin of safety | −16.7% | −5.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.8% | 15.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.5% | 11.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −7.0% | 42.6% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −3.5% | 43.2% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 5.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 18.0% | 25.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 28.7% | – |
| Return on equity | 2.5% | 11.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | 0.50 (better) | 0.15 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.4% |
| Payout ratio | – | 26.3% |
| Buyback yield | 2.3% | 4.7% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 2.3% | 7.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 30.7% | 7.3% |
| Held by insiders | 17.0% | 23.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $33.9K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.21% | 0.15% |
Go deeper
- CLST stock overview
- CLST income statement
- CLST valuation and score
- HFBL stock overview
- HFBL income statement
- HFBL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.