Celestica vs TTM Technologies
CLS and TTMI side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CLS and TTMI compare
Celestica grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (47.3% versus 27.6% for TTM Technologies).
Celestica keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.2% compared with 7.0% at TTM Technologies.
Celestica scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 13 for TTM Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CLS | TTMI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $8.7B |
| Share price | $265.53 | $82.94 |
| Change, 1 year | −21.4% | 30.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 2312% | 480% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.87 | 1.66 |
| Employees | – | 18K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 13 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 37.4× |
| P/S | – | 2.6× |
| P/B | – | 4.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 27.5× |
| PEG | – | 1.65 |
| FCF yield | – | −0.17% |
| Fair value | – | $69.83 |
| Margin of safety | – | −18.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 47.3% (better) | 27.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.6% (better) | 6.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 107% | 154% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 109% | 147% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 72.4% (better) | 0.12% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 12.0% | 21.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 8.8% | 9.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 7.2% (better) | 7.0% |
| FCF margin | 3.3% (better) | −0.45% |
| Return on equity | 52.7% (better) | 13.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 46.0% (better) | 13.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.33 (better) | 0.50 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.18 (better) | 1.39 |
| Interest coverage | 21.9× (better) | 7.6× |
| Current ratio | 1.23 | 1.78 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 3.76 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 69.0% | 92.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.81% | 2.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$254M | −$34.8M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.9% | 4.0% |
Go deeper
- CLS stock overview
- CLS income statement
- CLS valuation and score
- TTMI stock overview
- TTMI income statement
- TTMI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.