Celestica vs Sanmina
CLS and SANM side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CLS and SANM compare
Sanmina grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (58.6% versus 47.3% for Celestica).
Celestica keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.2% compared with 2.4% at Sanmina.
Celestica scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 10 for Sanmina), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CLS | SANM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $8.9B |
| Share price | $265.53 | $165.57 |
| Change, 1 year | −21.4% | 19.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 2312% | 283% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.87 | 1.24 |
| Employees | – | 39K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 29.6× |
| P/S | – | 0.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 13.2× |
| P/FCF | – | 14.9× |
| PEG | – | 5.49 |
| FCF yield | – | 6.7% |
| Fair value | – | $164.35 |
| Margin of safety | – | −0.74% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 47.3% | 58.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.6% (better) | 3.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 107% (better) | 18.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 109% (better) | 19.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 72.4% (better) | 18.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 12.0% (better) | 9.0% |
| Operating margin | 8.8% (better) | 4.2% |
| Net margin | 7.2% (better) | 2.4% |
| FCF margin | 3.3% | 4.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | 52.7% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 46.0% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.33 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.18 (better) | 0.47 |
| Interest coverage | 21.9× (better) | 5.6× |
| Current ratio | 1.23 | 1.78 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 2.68 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | – | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 69.0% | 93.8% |
| Held by insiders | 0.81% | 3.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$254M | −$42.9M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.9% | 3.3% |
Go deeper
- CLS stock overview
- CLS income statement
- CLS valuation and score
- SANM stock overview
- SANM income statement
- SANM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.