Clean Energy Fuels vs Montauk Renewables
CLNE and MNTK side by side, both in combination electric and gas, and other utility. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CLNE and MNTK compare
Clean Energy Fuels is the larger company, worth 3.0 times as much as Montauk Renewables ($406M against $136M).
Clean Energy Fuels grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.3% versus 4.3% for Montauk Renewables).
Montauk Renewables keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.2% compared with −16.9% at Clean Energy Fuels.
Montauk Renewables scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 6 for Clean Energy Fuels), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CLNE | MNTK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $406M | $136M |
| Share price | $1.84 | $0.954 |
| Change, 1 year | −18.2% | −53.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −75.9% | −89.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.56 | 0.84 |
| Employees | 503 | 189 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 15.9× |
| P/S | 0.9× | 0.7× (better) |
| P/B | 0.7× | 0.5× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 18.6× | 7.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | 9.1× | – |
| FCF yield | 11.0% (better) | −61.4% |
| Fair value | $1.57 | $2.29 |
| Margin of safety | −17.3% | 58.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.3% (better) | 4.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.8% | 11.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 200% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 200% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | −4.0% | 0.59% (better) |
| Net margin | −16.9% | 4.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 10.0% (better) | −44.1% |
| Return on equity | −13.3% | 3.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −2.2% | 0.32% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.39 (better) | 0.57 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.91 (better) | 3.93 |
| Interest coverage | −0.4× | 0.2× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.21 (better) | 0.62 |
| Altman Z-score | −0.60 | 0.93 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 49.3% | 15.0% |
| Held by insiders | 26.5% | 17.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$413K | $25.4K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.5% | 1.3% |
Go deeper
- CLNE stock overview
- CLNE income statement
- CLNE valuation and score
- MNTK stock overview
- MNTK income statement
- MNTK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.